Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy and Endoscopic Intracranial Cyst Fenestration in an Outpatient Ambulatory Surgery Center Yields Reduced Cost But Equal Efficacy and Safety Compared with Surgery in the Hospital.

BACKGROUND: A transition is underway in neurosurgery to perform relatively safe surgeries outpatient, often at ambulatory surgery centers (ASC). We sought to evaluate whether simple intracranial endoscopic procedures such as third ventriculostomy and cyst fenestration can be safely and effectively performed at an ASC, while comparing costs with the hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent elective intracranial neuroendoscopic (NE) intervention at either a quaternary hospital or an affiliated ASC between August 2014 and September 2017. Groups were compared on length of stay, perioperative and 30-day morbidity, as well as clinical outcome at last follow-up. The total cost for these procedures were compared in relative units between all ASC cases and a small subset of hospital cases. RESULTS: In total, 16 NE operations performed at the ASC (mean patient age 29.8 years) and 37 at the hospital (mean age 15.4 years) with average length of stay of 3.5 hours and 23.1 hours respectively (P < 0.05). There were no acute complications in either cohort or morbid events requiring hospitalization within 30 days. Surgical success was noted for 75% of the ASC patients and 73% of the hospital cohort. The mean cost of 5 randomly selected hospital operations with same-day discharge and 5 with overnight stay was 3.4 and 4.1 times that of the ASC cohort, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Elective endoscopic third ventriculostomy and other simple NE procedures can be safely and effectively performed at an ASC for appropriate patients with significantly reduced cost compared with the hospital.

Cost of prenatal versus postnatal myelomeningocele closure for both mother and child at 1 year of life.

OBJECTIVE: Prenatal myelomeningocele (MMC) closure has been performed in the United States for 2 decades. While prior work has focused on clinical outcomes of prenatal MMC closure, the cost of this procedure in comparison with that of postnatal MMC closure is unclear. The authors' aim was to compare the cost of prenatal versus postnatal MMC closure for both the child and mother at 1 year. METHODS: A prospective database of patients undergoing prenatal and postnatal MMC closure between 2011 and 2018 with 1-year follow-up was retrospectively reviewed. Charge data for relevant admissions were converted to a cost estimate using the authors' institution's Medicare hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratio. Children, mothers, and mother/child pairs were considered separately. The primary outcome was cost. Secondary outcomes included the need for hydrocephalus treatment, length of stay (LOS), and readmissions. Other covariates included gestational age at birth, MMC lesion level, and obstetric complications. RESULTS: The median cost of care for children in the prenatal group was greater, although not significantly so, at $58,406.71 (IQR $16,900.24-$88,951.01) compared with $49,889.95 (IQR $38,425.18-$115,163.86) for children in the postnatal group (p = 0.204). The median cost for mothers in the prenatal group was significantly greater at $24,548.29 (IQR $20,231.55-$36,862.31) compared with $5087.30 (IQR $4430.72-$5362.56) (p < 0.001). The median cost for mother/child pairs in the prenatal group was $102,377.75 (IQR $37,384.30-$118,527.74) compared with $55,667.82 (IQR $42,840.78-$120,058.06) (p = 0.45). Children in the prenatal group had a lower gestational age at birth (235.81 days vs 265.77 days, p < 0.001) and fewer readmissions (33.3% vs 72.7%, p < 0.001), and hydrocephalus treatment was less common (33.3% vs 90.9%, p < 0.001). Index LOS did not differ between children in the prenatal and postnatal groups (26.8 days vs 23.5 days, p = 0.63). Mothers in the prenatal group had longer LOS (15.92 days vs 4.68 days, p < 0.001) and more readmissions (18.5% vs 0.0%, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The median cost of prenatal versus postnatal MMC closure did not significantly differ from a hospital perspective at 1 year, although variability in cost was high for both groups. When considering the mother alone, prenatal MMC closure was costlier. Future work is needed to assess cost from a patient and societal perspective both at 1 year and beyond.

Variation in hospital charges in patients with external ventricular drains: comparison between the intensive care and surgical floor settings.

OBJECTIVE: Placement of an external ventricular drain (EVD) is a common and potentially life-saving neurosurgical procedure, but the economic aspect of EVD management and the relationship to medical expenditure remain poorly studied. Similarly, interinstitutional practice patterns vary significantly. Whereas some institutions require that patients with EVDs be monitored strictly within the intensive care unit (ICU), other institutions opt primarily for management of EVDs on the surgical floor. Therefore, an ICU burden for patients with EVDs may increase a patient's costs of hospitalization. The objective of the current study was to examine the expense differences between the ICU and the general neurosurgical floor for EVD care. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of data from 2 hospitals within a single, large academic institution-the University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) and Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH). Hospital charges were evaluated according to patients' location at the time of EVD management: SCH ICU, SCH floor, or UWMC ICU. Daily hospital charges from day of EVD insertion to day of removal were included and screened for days that would best represent baseline expenses for EVD care. Independent-samples Kruskal-Wallis analysis was performed to compare daily charges for the 3 settings. RESULTS: Data from a total of 261 hospital days for 23 patients were included in the analysis. Ten patients were cared for in the UWMC ICU and 13 in the SCH ICU and/or on the SCH neurosurgical floor. The median values for total daily hospital charges were $19,824.68 (interquartile range [IQR] $12,889.73-$38,494.81) for SCH ICU care, $8,620.88 (IQR $6,416.76-$11,851.36) for SCH floor care, and $10,002.13 (IQR $8,465.16-$12,123.03) for UWMC ICU care. At SCH, it was significantly more expensive to provide EVD care in the ICU than on the floor (p < 0.001), and the daily hospital charges for the UWMC ICU were significantly greater than for the SCH floor (p = 0.023). No adverse clinical event related to the presence of an EVD was identified in any of the settings. CONCLUSIONS: ICU admission solely for EVD care is costly. If safe EVD care can be provided outside of the ICU, it would represent a potential area for significant cost savings. Identifying appropriate patients for EVD care on the floor is multifactorial and requires vigilance in balancing the expenses associated with ICU utilization and optimal patient care.

Safety, Accuracy, and Cost Effectiveness of Bedside Bolt External Ventricular Drains (EVDs) in Comparison with Tunneled EVDs Inserted in Theaters.

OBJECTIVES: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is required frequently in neurosurgical patients to divert cerebrospinal fluid and monitor intracranial pressure. The usual practice is the tunneled EVD technique performed in operating theaters. EVD insertion through a bolt in intensive care also is described. We employ both practices in our institute. Herein, we compare the indications, accuracy, safety, and costs of the 2 techniques. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained EVD database of all patients undergoing first frontal EVD placement between January 2010 and December 2015. Those patients with preceding cerebrospinal fluid infection were excluded. We compared bolt EVD with tunneled EVD techniques in terms of accuracy of EVD tip location by analyzing computed tomography scans to grade catheter tip location as optimal (ipsilateral frontal horn) or otherwise suboptimal, and complications that include infection and revision rates. RESULTS: In total, 579 eligible patients aged 3 months to 84 years were identified; 430 had tunneled EVDs and 149 bolt EVDs. The most frequent diagnosis was intracranial hemorrhage (73% bolt vs. 50.4% tunneled group; P < 0.001). Other diagnoses included tumor (4.7% bolt vs. 19.1% tunneled; P < 0.001) and traumatic brain injury (17.5% bolt vs. 17.4% tunneled). In the bolt EVD group 66.4% of EVD tips were optimal, compared with 61.0% in the tunneled group (P = 0.33). Infection was confirmed in 15 (10.0%) bolt EVDs compared with 61 (14.2%) tunneled EVDs (P = 0.2). Each bolt EVD kit costs £260, whereas placing a tunneled one in the theater costs £1316. CONCLUSIONS: Bedside bolt EVD placement is safe, accurate, and cost effective in selective patients with hemorrhage-related hydrocephalus.

The cost of hydrocephalus: a cost-effectiveness model for evaluating surgical techniques.

In BriefThe authors analyzed the costs associated with the three different procedures used to treat hydrocephalus in the pediatric population. They believe this study highlights the importance of patient-specific treatment decisions that are based on etiology and previous intervention. The patient-specific medical characteristics are a driving force in the cost of care.

The burden and risk factors of ventriculostomy occlusion in a high-volume cerebrovascular practice: results of an ongoing prospective database.

OBJECT Ventriculostomy occlusion is a known complication after external ventricular drain (EVD) placement. There have been no prospective published series that primarily evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for EVD occlusion. These phenomena are investigated using a prospective database. METHODS An ongoing prospective study of all patients undergoing frontal EVD placement in the Neurosurgery Intensive Care Unit at the University of Florida was accessed for the purposes of this analysis. Demographic, procedural, and radiographic data were recorded prospectively and retrospectively. The need for catheter irrigation or replacement was meticulously documented. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed. RESULTS Ninety-eight of 101 total enrolled patients had accessible data, amounting to 131 total catheters and 1076 total catheter days. Nineteen percent of patients required at least 1 replacement. Forty-one percent of catheters developed at least 1 temporary occlusion, with an average of 2.4 irrigations per patient. Intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 28% of patients after the first EVD placement (2% resulting in new neurological deficit) and in 62% of patients after 1 replacement. The cost of occlusion is estimated at $615 per enrolled patient. Therapeutic anticoagulation and use of small EVD catheters were statistically significant predictors of permanent occlusion (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS EVD occlusion is frequent and imparts a significant burden in terms of patient morbidity, physician upkeep, and cost. This study suggests that developing strategies or devices to prevent EVD occlusion, such as the preferential use of larger diameter catheters, may be beneficial in reducing the burden associated with ventriculostomy malfunction.

The Impact of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy on Shunt Revision Rate: A 14-Year Experience at a Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: Shunt-related procedures in the treatment of hydrocephalus are often associated with malfunction and revision resulting in significant patient morbidity and financial impact on the health care system. The increased utilization of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) as an alternative treatment paradigm for obstructive hydrocephalus carries the theoretical expectation of concomitant decreased numbers of shunt procedures. The objective of the present study was to determine the impact of ETV on shunt-related procedures within a 14-year interval (1998-2011), during which ETV has gained wider acceptance and greater utilization. METHODS: This retrospective chart review describes the annual rate of pediatric patients who underwent either ETV or shunt-related procedures at New York Presbyterian Hospital Weill-Cornell Medical Center. Statistical analyses were done to analyze possible correlation between relative rates of these cases. RESULTS: During the 14-year study period, 954 procedures were performed for the treatment of hydrocephalus (159 ETVs and 795 shunt-related procedures). Of the shunts, 356 were initial insertions and 439 were revisions. The number of ETVs increased from 8 procedures in 1998/1999 to 34 in 2010/2011, whereas the total number of annual shunt-related procedures decreased from 146 to 99. The relative ratios of ETVs and shunt-related procedures to the total number of cases demonstrate an inverse relationship over time (Spearman correlation coefficient rs = -1.0; P = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Based on prior cost-effectiveness analyses, the observed trend of the inverse correlation between ETVs and shunt-related procedures may contribute to financial savings and improvement in patient outcomes. Further study is required to define the impact on morbidity and associated success rates.

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy has no higher costs than ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) compared to ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in the treatment of hydrocephalus in children. METHOD: We studied 103 children with hydrocephalus, 52 of which were treated with ETV and 51 with VPS in a prospective cohort. Treatment costs were compared within the first year after surgery, including subsequent surgery or hospitalization. RESULTS: Twenty (38.4%) of the 52 children treated with VPS needed another procedure due to shunt failure, compared to 11 (21.5%) of 51 children in the ETV group. The average costs per patient in the group treated with ETV was USD$ 2,177,66±517.73 compared to USD$ 2,890.68±2,835.02 for the VPS group. CONCLUSIONS: In this series there was no significant difference in costs between the ETV and VPS groups.

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy has no higher costs than ventriculoperitoneal shunt / Terceiro ventriculostomia endoscópica não apresenta custos mais elevados do que a derivação ventrículo peritoneal

Objective: To evaluate the cost of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) compared to ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in the treatment of hydrocephalus in children. Method: We studied 103 children with hydrocephalus, 52 of which were treated with ETV and 51 with VPS in a prospective cohort. Treatment costs were compared within the first year after surgery, including subsequent surgery or hospitalization. Results: Twenty (38.4%) of the 52 children treated with VPS needed another procedure due to shunt failure, compared to 11 (21.5%) of 51 children in the ETV group. The average costs per patient in the group treated with ETV was USD$ 2,177,66±517.73 compared to USD$ 2,890.68±2,835.02 for the VPS group. Conclusions: In this series there was no significant difference in costs between the ETV and VPS groups. .

Objetivo: Avaliar os custos da terceiro ventriculostomia endoscópica (TVE) comparada à derivação ventrículo peritoneal (DVP) no tratamento da hidrocefalia em crianças. Método: Foram estudadas 103 crianças com hidrocefalia, 52 das quais tratadas com TVE e 51 com DVP numa coorte prospectiva. Foram comparados os custos do tratamento no primeiro ano após a cirurgia, incluindo cirurgias ou internações subsequentes. Resultados: Vinte (38,4%) das 52 crianças tratadas com DVP necessitaram de outro procedimento por disfunção da válvula, em comparação a 11 (21,5%) das 51 crianças do grupo tratado com TVE. Os custos médios por paciente no grupo tratado com TVE foram de USD$ 2,177.66±517.73 comparados a USD$ 2.890,68±2.835,02 para o grupo DVP. Conclusões: Nesta série não houve diferença significativa de custos entre o grupo TVE e DVP. .

Ventriculostomy: Frequency, length of stay and in-hospital mortality in the United States of America, 1988-2010.

Ventriculostomy is a common neurosurgical procedure. We evaluated a large national sample of data regarding epidemiologic trends in neurosurgical practice relating to ventriculostomy. The USA Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1988 to 2010) provided retrospective data on patients hospitalized who underwent a ventriculostomy procedure. We categorized ventriculostomy procedures as the principal procedure performed for definitive treatment or as any other procedure. We identified 101,577 relevant hospital admissions with an estimated national volume of 507,762 hospital admissions from 1988 to 2010. For all patients, the mean age was 45.0 years and 46.5% were female. The three most common individual principal diagnoses were subarachnoid hemorrhage (19.1%), intracerebral hemorrhage (14.9%), and obstructive hydrocephalus (3.8%). The three most common principal procedures were other excision or destruction of lesion or tissue of brain (16.0%), clipping of aneurysm (13.5%), and temporary tracheostomy (10.8%). Mean length of stay was 20.8 days and in-hospital mortality was 24.5%. In-hospital mortality was associated with emergency admission (multivariate odds ratio 1.98; 95% confidence interval 1.92-2.05), age 45 years or greater (mean of data set) (1.91; 1.85-1.98), multiple ventriculostomies (1.55; 1.44-1.67), and ventriculostomy as a principal procedure (1.39; 1.35-1.44). A total of 32.7% of patients were discharged to home. Most (94.3%) hospitalizations had one, 5.0% had two, and 0.7% multiple (three or more) ventriculostomies performed. Neurosurgeons must be aware of the association of in-hospital mortality, especially during the first days of admission, particularly when ventriculostomy is the principal procedure performed for definitive treatment during the hospitalization.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic third ventriculostomy.

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) is currently the principal alternative to cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement in the management of pediatric hydrocephalus. Cost-effectiveness analysis can help determine the optimal strategy for integrating these different approaches. METHODS: All patients (n = 28) who underwent ETV at British Columbia's Children's Hospital between 1989 and 1998 were matched for age, pathogenesis, and number of previous shunt procedures, with patients treated with cerebrospinal fluid shunts. To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis, hydrocephalus-related resource consumption and outcome (determined as the number of hydrocephalus treatment-free days during follow-up) were then retrospectively identified. Cost data were linked to resource use to provide a total cost for all resources used. Costs and outcomes were discounted annually at 5% by standard economic analysis methods. RESULTS: Twenty-four of 28 ETV patients had obstructive hydrocephalus. Over equivalent follow-up periods (median, 35 mo), the ETV success rate (defined by need for reoperation) was 54%. One hydrocephalus-related death and one hemiparesis occurred in the ETV group. No permanent procedure-related morbidity or mortality was seen in the shunt group. The cost/effect ratios for the two groups were similar. The additional incremental resource use by the shunt group included six readmissions and eight reoperations. ETV mean costs per patient were $10,570 +/- $7628, versus $10,922 +/- $8722 for the shunt group (Canadian dollars for the year 2000). Costs accrued more quickly for the shunt group as time passed. The additional incremental outcome benefit to the endoscopy group was 86 treatment-free days (3.07 d per patient [95% confidence interval, -7.56 to 13.70 d]). Neither of these differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSION: In this matched cohort, ETV was not significantly less costly or more effective over a median 35 months of follow-up, with a 54% initial ETV success rate, even before the additional morbidity and mortality encountered were taken into account. The time course for the accrued costs suggests that a larger cohort, longer follow-up, or higher success rates are needed to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of this therapy.

An economic argument in favour of endoscopic third ventriculostomy as a treatment for obstructive hydrocephalus.

This project was undertaken to examine the health resource implications of performing endoscopic third ventriculostomy as an alternative to CSF shunting in appropriate patients. We carried out a retrospective study of case records and X-rays of patients shunted de novo at the INS, Glasgow for the two year period 1990-1991. We identified all those patients who would have been suitable for endoscopic third ventriculostomy and examined the shunt complications and extra days in hospital required by these patients. A total of 150 new shunts was inserted during the two year period. Of these, 23 patients (15%)were judged suitable for endoscopic third ventriculostomy as an alternative to CSF shunting. Eight out of 23 patients required a total of 29 repeat operations and an extra 230 days in hospital due to shunt complications. Assuming an 80% success (shunt free) rate for endoscopic third ventriculostomy, we calculate that 9 operations and 74 bed days per year could be saved by using this technique. We conclude that in units undertaking a large number of CSF shunt insertions, investment in neuroendoscopic equipment, training, and expertise has the potential to release significant resources for other uses.